{"id":641,"date":"2013-02-27T13:26:26","date_gmt":"2013-02-27T20:26:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelclara.com\/?p=641"},"modified":"2013-07-08T20:25:36","modified_gmt":"2013-07-09T02:25:36","slug":"the-truth-is-not-their-friend","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/michaelclara.com\/the-truth-is-not-their-friend\/","title":{"rendered":"The Truth Is Not Their Friend"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n Superintendent\u00a0Issued A Media Advisory :\u00a0District Media Advisory<\/a><\/p>\n The\u00a0superintendent’s media advisory is quoted in the Tribune:<\/p>\n “We are disappointed that [Clara] feels the need to seek solutions by contacting federal officials in Denver instead of working collaboratively with the Board of Education and the district,” the statement reads. “We believe Mr. Clara\u2019s complaints can and should be addressed through established board protocol. We are committed to advocating for all students.” (Link To Article<\/a>).<\/p>\n As the Tribune article states. I brought up the issue of teacher distribution in the\u00a0February\u00a019th Board meeting. I was told by the\u00a0superintendent\u00a0and the board vice president that we could NOT discuss the issue further because\u00a0it was not on the agenda.<\/p>\n I then sent a letter and email to the board president, requesting that this issue be placed on the agenda of a future meeting:\u00a0Agenda Request Letter, Page 1<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Agenda Request Letter, Page 2<\/a><\/p>\n The board president replied that she would not place it on the agenda (see text of emails at the end of this post<\/em>)<\/p>\n So, I agree with the media\u00a0statement. The board should be working as a “collaborative” body. Collaboration includes honoring the issues that each member brings to the table, not\u00a0slamming\u00a0\u00a0the door shut.<\/p>\n I did avail myself of “board protocol”. There were only two of us on the board that felt that this was worthy enough to be placed on the agenda. The policy states, if the president does not want to place an item on the agenda, then three board members can request it and the item will get placed on the agenda. I was not able to meet that threshold.<\/p>\n I\u00a0believe\u00a0an injustice is\u00a0occurring. Others on the board don’t see it. I honor\u00a0their\u00a0perspective\u00a0and filed the complaint\u00a0with the office of civil rights. Just\u00a0because\u00a0the board does not see an issue from my community as an injustice does not mean I am\u00a0done\u00a0with it. My obligation is to my neighbors who elected me not the bureaucracy.<\/p>\n The\u00a0superintendent\u00a0and board president can’t have it both ways. If they don’t allow an injustice to be deliberated upon in a school board meeting, they can’t be “disappointed” when I seek a remedy through other branches of government.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n