{"id":3080,"date":"2016-09-13T09:30:03","date_gmt":"2016-09-13T15:30:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelclara.com\/?p=3080"},"modified":"2016-09-13T09:30:03","modified_gmt":"2016-09-13T15:30:03","slug":"no-transparency-accountability-at-the-schoolhouse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/michaelclara.com\/no-transparency-accountability-at-the-schoolhouse\/","title":{"rendered":"No Transparency & Accountability at the Schoolhouse"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Breakdown<\/a>

2nd GRAMA Appeal Letter<\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

12 September 2016<\/p>\n


\nHAND DELIVERED<\/span><\/b>
\nMs. Janet Roberts, Business Administrator
\n\u2105 Salt Lake City School District
\n440 East 100 South
\nSalt Lake City, Utah 84111
\nRe:<\/b> 2nd<\/sup> GRAMA Notice of Appeal: Gang Prevention Expenditures<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Dear Ms. Roberts,
\nActing under the authority of my elected office, and in my official capacity as a member of the Salt Lake City Board of Education, I submit the following appeal on behalf of the residents of Salt Lake City, District 2.
[1]<\/a><\/p>\n

Pursuant to Utah Government Records Management Act \u2013 please accept this: GRAMA NOTICE OF APPEAL<\/span><\/b> in your capacity as the district\u2019s chief administrative officer. [2]<\/a><\/p>\n

BACKGROUND<\/b>
\nOn April 5, 2016 – <\/b>At the regularly scheduled Board meeting, I specifically requested that the Board look at student, police, community and gang intervention in a comprehensive manner within the context of budget development.
[3]<\/a> <\/b><\/p>\n

On May 16, 2016 \u2013 <\/b>I met with Superintendent Cunningham <\/b>and among other issues advised her of my concern for the manner in which District personnel were misappropriating state funding allocated to the District for gang prevention and intervention. <\/b><\/p>\n

On May 17, 2016<\/b> \u2013During a regularly scheduled Board meeting, I renewed my request for financial information on the gang prevention and for at-risk students. [4]<\/a><\/p>\n

On June 7, 2016<\/b> \u2013 Prior to the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board commencing, I once again asked you in your capacity of the Board\u2019s Business Administrator, for information on gang funding as well as clarification on a $20,000.00 expenditure for the Salt Lake Area Gang Project.<\/p>\n

You consulted with Larry Madden who claimed to not have any information on the expenditure, but would check with one of his subordinates and get back to me. [5]<\/a><\/p>\n

On June 21, 2016 \u2013 <\/b>During the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, <\/b>I once again, raised the issue of the status of the District\u2019s gang intervention program. The Board president spoke to my request with a commitment to have the information provided to me. You spoke to my concern and advised me that it was a grant from the state and you signed off on it, although you would not provide me any information in response to my questions. In that same meeting I asked about the details of RDA expenditures. I was told that the information I requested, would be provided.<\/p>\n

On July 12, 2016<\/b>– I sent Superintendent Cunningham an email renewing my request for information on the finances of the District for at-risk students. I in part stated the following:<\/p>\n

On May 6, 2016 \u2013Superintendent Withers sent me the following information; “Enhancements for At-Risk Students (EARS) Resources\u201d. <\/i><\/p>\n

Our EARS funding peaked at $5,051,765 in 2008-09 and totals $2,463,967 for the current year (2015-16). <\/i><\/p>\n

The following programs in the General Fund receive EARS allocations: <\/i><\/p>\n

Board Distributed Student Achievement Funds (elementary); <\/i><\/p>\n

Program 1013-District Achievement Testing; <\/i><\/p>\n

Program 1016-AVID\/Equity; program 4255-MESA; <\/i><\/p>\n

Program 4261-Truant Student; <\/i><\/p>\n

Program 4266-ALS Services; and, <\/i><\/p>\n

Program 4267-ESL Endorsement. <\/i><\/p>\n

The EARS resources also help fund the 7.0 FTE used to support high school English as a Second Language (ESL) classes.”<\/i><\/p>\n

I went on to advise Superintendent Cunningham:<\/p>\n

All that is doing, is telling me that the funding is being scattered among these categories. This does not tell me what this funding is being used for. I would like to know the specific expenditures that EARS money is being used for in terms of amount of monies and their purpose. I cannot make an informed decision on funding if I do not have a clear picture on how the District is utilizing this particular category of state funding.<\/i><\/p>\n

A couple of months ago, I asked Janet R. what was the $20,000.00, expenditure for Salt Lake Area\u00a0Gang\u00a0Project Inc. in the May 3, 2016 \u2013 Purchase report was used for. Janet referred the question to Larry M. who confirmed that Misty S. spent the money. Someone was going to get back to me on what exactly that money was used for.<\/i><\/p>\n

I am also wanting to see a copy of the\u00a0Gang\u00a0Prevention application that was submitted to the State Office of Education. I am being told that Colors of Success is being eliminated from the District. <\/i><\/p>\n

If that is true, then I submit that this District is placing the community in danger if we are eliminating this type of\u00a0gang\u00a0intervention program.<\/i><\/p>\n

I have also asked for a break down on how the District is funding transportation with school buses. Earlier this year Barbra K. attempted to cancel a school bus that serves students attending Clayton Middle School. I am of the opinion that bus routes and their funding are the purview of the Board not a District administrator.<\/i><\/p>\n

I would also like to know the total amount of RDA funding that the District\u00a0receives\u00a0and where\u00a0that money is being spent.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

Is there a place to know where Title I\u00a0funding\u00a0is being spent? I continue to\u00a0receive\u00a0complaints from employees that Title I monies are being spent\u00a0inappropriately. Can you provide me a break down on how and where Title I\u00a0money\u00a0is being expended throughout\u00a0the District?\u00a0\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

I would also like to know what funding the District plans to put forward towards the University of Virginia turn around program during the 2016-2017 school year. What is the source of that funding?\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

Finally, I want to ensure that the Board has been informed about all available funding. Last year we were told of the need to raise taxes by 1.5 Million and then in late November we are told of an additional ongoing 2 million dollars available in the budget.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

It is imperative that all information about revenue be disclosed to the Board during the budget process and prior to the Truth in Taxation hearing, not afterwards.\u00a0<\/i>[6]<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/i><\/p>\n

On July 18, 2016<\/b>– I once again met with Superintendent Cunningham and among other issues renewed my request for information on the status of at-risk student funding. In that meeting, I renewed my request for information on the finances of the District. I also renewed my objection to personnel changes occurring without Board approval. I also renewed my request for an updated organization chart of the District administration and departments.<\/p>\n

On July 29, 2016<\/b> \u2013 I received a copy of the Gang Prevention and Intervention proposal signed and submitted to the State Office of Education by you and Chief Operations Officer, Larry Madden, back in May of this year.[7]<\/a> The proposal confirmed what I was being told, that you and Chief Madden did indeed eliminate Colors of Success as the District\u2019s gang intervention program. In my correspondence to the Superintendent I asked the following:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026from a procurement standpoint, [8]<\/b><\/a> can you please advise me what process Administrator Roberts and Chief Madden followed in order to utilize the services of a teacher from East High and her program, Technique for Tough Times in place of Color of Success? My records indicate that Colors of Success is the District\u2019s designated \u201cSole Provider\u201d [9]<\/b><\/a> for Gang Prevention programs within the District? [10]<\/b><\/a> <\/i><\/p>\n

I have as of yet to receive a response from the Superintendent.<\/p>\n

On July 31, 2016<\/b> \u2013 I sent Superintendent Cunningham correspondence that she acknowledged receiving, yet as of this writing, has not responded to my requests in that email. I here renew one of them:<\/p>\n

In light of the fact that I have received multiple reports of administrators utilizing District resources in order to generate income for their private sector business, I would request copies of all \u201cconflict of interest\u201d declared by employees of the District as required by state statute: <\/i>\u201cAn employee shall declare a potential conflict of interest\u2026\u201d<\/i>[11]<\/b><\/i><\/a><\/i><\/p>\n

On August 2, 2016<\/b> \u2013 During a regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, I once again renewed my request for details on the finances of the District and a current organizational chart of the departments and personnel on the District level. [12]<\/a><\/p>\n

On August 3, 2016<\/b> – I did receive scant information (four pages) on Title I expenditures. However, it is not to the level of detail that I require in order to make decisions on the finances of the District. [13]<\/a><\/p>\n

On August 25, 2016<\/b> \u2013 I submitted a GRAMA request to Superintendent Cunningham, \u201cformally\u201d<\/i> requesting information on the finances of the District, which I had previously \u201cinformally\u201d<\/i> requested but had not yet received. [14]<\/a><\/p>\n

On September 2, 2016<\/b> \u2013 After receiving no response from Superintendent Cunningham, which under GRAMA is considered a denial, I sent a GRAMA appeal to your attention. [15]<\/a><\/p>\n

Later that day, I did receive a response to my initial GRAMA request from the Superintendent\u2019s attorney, Kristina Kindl, who advised me that I would be provided the requested information upon payment of $337.50.<\/p>\n

On September 10, 2016<\/b> \u2013 I received a certified letter from you stating that my appeal was \u201cmoot\u201d<\/i> because you were asserting that attorney Kindle\u2019s (Superintendent\u2019s legal counsel) reply to my email was within the specified timeline under GRAMA. I don\u2019t agree with your math, nevertheless, I am submitting yet another GRAMA appeal in the form of this correspondence. In your rejection letter, you duplicitously admonish me as follows:<\/p>\n

\u2026Please keep in mind that as an elected board member, you can request district information through the informal process provided for in Board Policy B-1: Board of Education Legal Status, Responsibilities, and Ethics. <\/i><\/p>\n

This Policy outlines the process through which board members can receive information necessary for the performance of their elected duties, and receive such information free of charge, and may, if appropriate, provide you with information that is not available to the general public.<\/i> <\/sup>[16]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

You will note that I have documented numerous instances that I did indeed \u201crequest district information through the informal process\u201d<\/i> which includes negative responses from you.<\/p>\n

On September 12, 2016<\/b> \u2013 I am submitting this GRAMA Denial Appeal to you, in your capacity as the Chief Administrative Officer of the District as prescribed in GRAMA.<\/p>\n

APPEAL<\/span><\/b>
\nI am appealing Superintendent Cunningham\u2019s decision to charge me $337.50. for information on the finances of the District as my \u201clegal rights are directly implicated by the information in the records\u201d<\/i> that I am requesting
[17]<\/a> as I am a duly elected member of the Board of Education. [18]<\/a> Current Utah law states that local Board members are elected by a vote of the people.\u00a0 <\/sup>[19]<\/sup><\/a> The law further states the following:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2026<\/i>an elected member of a local school board serves and represents the residents of the local school board member’s district, and that service and representation may not be restricted or impaired by the local school board member’s membership on, or obligations to, the local school board.\u201d<\/i> <\/sup>[20]<\/sup><\/a><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n

Among other responsibilities state statue endows a local Board of Education with the following responsibilities: <\/sup>[21]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

Implement training programs for school administrators, including basic management training, best practices in instructional methods, budget training, staff management, managing for learning results and continuous improvement, and how to help every child achieve optimal learning in core academics.<\/i><\/p>\n